In a landmark decision that has sent ripples through Ghana’s political landscape, the Supreme Court on December 27, 2024, has quashed the re-collated parliamentary election results in four constituencies—Okaikwei Central, Ablekuma North, Tema Central, and Techiman South. This ruling overturns earlier declarations by the Electoral Commission (EC) and highlights the critical importance of adherence to due process in electoral matters.
The Case in Brief (Parliamentary Election Results)
The case, brought before the Supreme Court by aggrieved parties, challenged the legality of the EC’s re-collation of results in the aftermath of the 2024 parliamentary elections. The petitioners argued that the re-collation process violated constitutional provisions and was conducted in a manner that undermined public confidence in the electoral system.
After hearing arguments from all sides, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that the re-collation of the election results lacked the necessary legal basis and procedural transparency. The court’s judgment effectively nullifies the re-collated results and reinstates the original tallies, pending further resolution by the EC.
Political Reactions Post Election
The ruling has elicited mixed reactions across the political divide. The National Democratic Congress (NDC), which had expressed concerns about the fairness of the re-collation process, welcomed the decision as a vindication of their position. “This judgment is a win for democracy and the rule of law. It reinforces the principle that the will of the people cannot be manipulated,” said an NDC spokesperson.
The New Patriotic Party (NPP), however, has been more reserved in its response. While some party members have expressed disappointment, others have called for calm and urged the EC to work within the legal framework to address the situation.
Civil Society and Legal Perspectives
Civil society organizations and legal experts have lauded the Supreme Court’s ruling as a necessary corrective measure. “This decision sends a strong message about the importance of procedural integrity in electoral processes. It is a reminder that shortcuts and irregularities will not stand up to judicial scrutiny,” said a representative from the Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana).
Some legal analysts have also pointed to the broader implications of the ruling. “This judgment underscores the need for comprehensive electoral reforms, particularly in the areas of vote collation and dispute resolution. It’s an opportunity for the EC to strengthen its processes and rebuild public trust,” noted constitutional lawyer Kwame Boakye.
Public Sentiment
The public’s reaction to the ruling has been both humorous and critical, as Ghanaians took to social media to share their views. Memes likening the re-collation process to a never-ending drama have gone viral, but beneath the humor lies a palpable frustration with recurring electoral controversies. “How do we keep getting this wrong? Elections are about numbers, and yet the math always seems off,” lamented one voter.
Looking Ahead
The Supreme Court’s decision has placed the spotlight squarely on the Electoral Commission. As the nation awaits the EC’s next steps, calls for transparency, stakeholder engagement, and adherence to the rule of law have grown louder. Political analysts warn that how the EC handles this situation will have significant implications for Ghana’s democratic trajectory.
For now, the ruling serves as a powerful reminder that the integrity of elections is not just about casting votes but also about ensuring that every stage of the process upholds the principles of fairness, legality, and accountability. As Ghana’s democratic journey continues, the lessons from this ruling will undoubtedly shape the country’s electoral landscape for years to come.
Pingback: 2024 GHANA'S PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS: THE BATTLE OF BALLOTS, RE-COLLATIONS, AND POLITICAL SHOWDOWNS! - Informed Ghana