The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2019 (Act 989), was introduced to promote transparency and accountability by giving Ghanaians the right to access public information. Recent plans to restructure the ISD and dissolve the Ministry of Information have raised concerns about RTI’s future.
These changes will significantly impact Ghana’s efforts to strengthen transparency and accountability. The announcement that the ISD will now fall under the Office of the President also raises questions about its role in governance. What does this mean for the 500 RTI officers recruited in recent years? How will it shape Ghana’s broader transparency agenda? The decision to place the ISD under the Presidency sparks both hope and uncertainty. Some see it as a chance for greater visibility and support, while others worry about its implications for the country’s transparency efforts.
Restructuring ISD and Its Implications for RTI
The move to place the ISD under the Office of the President has stirred up a mix of hope and intrigue. On the one hand, this shift could elevate the department’s profile, providing it with more direct oversight and potentially greater resources to fulfill its mandate.
There are concerns about how this change could affect the ISD’s independence. The RTI Act relies on impartiality and public trust. With a focus on strengthening capacity, this restructuring could improve efficiency and streamline RTI delivery.
The Access to Information Division (ATID) of the ISD currently facilitates RTI requests and ensures compliance with the law. Moving the ISD under the Office of the President and eliminating the Ministry of Information creates opportunities and challenges:
1. Centralization of the ISD Under the Presidency
Placing the ISD under the Presidency could give it a higher profile and more direct access to decision-making. This could help speed up processes, secure more funding, and ensure quicker responses to RTI requests. But there’s also the risk that this centralization might open the door to political influence, which could compromise the impartiality of the information shared. However, it could also expose the RTI framework to undue political influence, potentially affecting the impartiality of information dissemination.
2. Redefining Roles for RTI Officers
The government’s recruitment of approximately 500 RTI officers marked a significant step forward in implementing the RTI Act. However, with the restructuring, there is a need to clarify how their roles will evolve. Having a clear mandate and updating their responsibilities will be key to keeping the momentum going in RTI awareness and service delivery.
3. Risk of Disruption During Transition
Restructuring efforts often lead to temporary disruptions, including staff reassignment and loss of institutional knowledge. This could delay responses to RTI requests and undermine public trust in the system.
Possible Benefits of Restructuring the ISD
For the 500 RTI officers who have been instrumental in making the RTI Act accessible to Ghanaians, this restructuring signals an opportunity for growth and modernization. Instead of focusing solely on traditional roles, officers could see their responsibilities evolve in line with a more dynamic approach to governance.
This modernization could involve training in advanced information management systems, helping them process requests more quickly and efficiently. With the ISD’s potential upgrade, RTI officers could play an even more pivotal role in shaping how transparency and accountability are delivered in a digital-first era.
Rather than a cause for concern, this could represent a chance for these officers to become even more empowered advocates for openness and citizen engagement.
While these changes bring challenges, they also open up opportunities to strengthen RTI implementation.
- Increased Visibility
Moving the ISD under the Presidency could highlight the importance of RTI as a key national priority. - Streamlined Processes
With a centralized structure, RTI operations could become more efficient, reducing bureaucratic delays and ensuring faster access to information. - Improved Coordination
The Presidency’s direct oversight might foster better coordination across government agencies, ensuring compliance with the RTI Act.
Key Concerns Moving Forward
Of course, any restructuring comes with risks, but it also brings opportunities. The key will be ensuring that the new framework for the ISD keeps the independence and accessibility of RTI processes at the forefront. Citizens must continue to feel confident that their requests for information will be handled impartially, regardless of where the department is situated within the government’s structure.
To maintain this trust, transparency should remain at the heart of every decision. By bringing in stakeholders—like RTI officers, civil society groups, and the public—the government can make sure these changes enhance, not undermine, the RTI system.
Despite the potential benefits, there are critical areas that require attention:
1. Protecting the Independence of RTI Officers
Ensuring that RTI officers can work without political interference is vital. Clear safeguards need to be put in place to protect the integrity and fairness of the information they provide.
2. Empowering and Advancing RTI Officers
The government must outline a clear path for the information officer responsible for RTI operations, focusing on redefining their roles and providing continuous training. Ensuring their stability and growth is essential to sustaining the progress achieved in RTI implementation.
3. Public Awareness and Engagement
Throughout the transition, it’s crucial that public sensitization remains a top priority.
4. Legislative Clarity
The government should offer clear legislative guidance on how RTI operations will be handled under the Presidency.
Conclusion
Change can feel uncertain, but it also opens up opportunities for progress. The government’s restructuring of the ISD could mark the beginning of a new chapter for RTI in Ghana. If approached with careful planning and clear communication, this transition could modernize how information is shared, making the system even more robust and citizen focused.
For RTI officers, this is an opportunity to embrace new technologies and opportunities that can improve their work and amplify their impact. And for citizens, it’s a chance to advocate for an even stronger culture of transparency and accountability.
In the end, what matters most is that the principles of openness and accessibility remain at the core of Ghana’s governance. With the right approach, this restructuring could take the RTI Act’s implementation to new heights, proving once again that transparency is not just a policy—it’s a cornerstone of democracy.
The restructuring of the ISD and the abolition of the Ministry of Information present both opportunities and risks for RTI implementation in Ghana. Moving the ISD under the Presidency could enhance visibility and streamline operations but also raises concerns about political influence and the future of RTI officers.
To ensure the continued success of RTI, the government must prioritize transparency, protect the independence of RTI officers, and maintain public trust throughout the transition.
By addressing these concerns, Ghana can safeguard the progress made in promoting accountability and transparency under the RTI Act.
Meta Description
How does restructuring Ghana’s ISD and moving it under the Presidency impact the Right to Information Act (RTI)? Learn about the challenges, opportunities, and future of RTI officers.